Zsigmunt
Mar 11, 2008, 01:20 PM
Dear all,
I don't know if Pink's classification, revised in the RIC, is still accurate but until recently I had not found any unlisted argentei from Antioch. It seems to me this one makes exception to the rule and I would be glad if some of you were aware of other unlisted coins with the same mintmark (* ANTH •). I did not find any mention of it in the Seaby, nor the RIC catalogues.
Description:
AR Argenteus, 5 h., weight : 3.18 g.
Av/ Head right, laur.
MAXIMIA-NVS AVG
Rv/ Three-turreted camp-gate, open; no doors.
VIRTVS - MILITVM
Mintmark: * ANTH •
Rq: the mintmark is similar to RIC 39b but with the dot after the H, and not before.
Thanks, Jay.
I don't know if Pink's classification, revised in the RIC, is still accurate but until recently I had not found any unlisted argentei from Antioch. It seems to me this one makes exception to the rule and I would be glad if some of you were aware of other unlisted coins with the same mintmark (* ANTH •). I did not find any mention of it in the Seaby, nor the RIC catalogues.
Description:
AR Argenteus, 5 h., weight : 3.18 g.
Av/ Head right, laur.
MAXIMIA-NVS AVG
Rv/ Three-turreted camp-gate, open; no doors.
VIRTVS - MILITVM
Mintmark: * ANTH •
Rq: the mintmark is similar to RIC 39b but with the dot after the H, and not before.
Thanks, Jay.